Some have pointed out that the early studies showing high M26 in Castile suffered from small sample sizes. Further, more recent posts and agglomerations of studies show different numbers than what is quoted below. While Eupedia is usually full of pseudoscientific malarky, this post purports to have collected studies. And this website claims to have done the same, specific to Spain.
So, taken together, we get the following on our M26 I2a1a leaderboard:
(1) Sardinia (Island Isolated) ~37%
(2) Samnium (Mountainous Central Italy) ~10%
(3) Navarre (Mountainous Northern Spain) ~9%
(4) Sicily (Another Island) ~7%
(5) Basque Country (More Mountains) ~5%
(6) Aragon, Spain ~5%
(7) England, Ireland, and ALL W. European Islands whether Mediterranean, Atlantic, or Channel ~3%
We also have some allegations (no studies cited) that Andalusia (Spain) is in double digits.
From what I can tell, this is the picture that has emerged. Please cite links to studies if you have any.
A blog where you can get information on genealogy DNA tests, European history, scientific studies, genetics, and anthropology.
Tuesday, April 1, 2014
Friday, March 7, 2014
Corrected Study Confirms Even More I-M26 12a1a In Archaic Zones of Italy
The great paper by Brisghelli, et. al., referred to and discussed extensively below, has been updated and corrected. The updates are stunning. Now, the descendants of the once-mighty Samnites, the rugged mountain-dwellers of the Southern Italian interior, have shown to be 10% I-M26.
The corrected table can be found by clicking this link.
This pushes Samnites into third place in the M26 frequency chart. It also confirms what I've posted previously about M26 being found in large numbers among Northern Calabrian mountaineers, who have long been noted to be offshoots of the Samnites. (The Ancient sources said that the Brutti broke off from the Lucanians, and the Lucanians broke off from the Samnites. Each of these hardy tribes battle Rome for supremacy in pre-Empire Italy, and they almost won.)
But I digress. Here are the updated charts of frequency for M-26:
Sardinia ~37%
Castile ~19%
Samnium ~10%
Sicily ~7%
Basque Country ~5%
England, Ireland, and ALL W. European Islands whether Mediterranean, Atlantic, or Channel ~3%
General Italy/France ~2%
This might clear things up a bit for the spread of M26.
M26's ancestral clade, P37.2, is concentrated very strongly in the Balkans, and that all data seems to indicate that M26 followed a route that went westward through Italy. In other words, if there had been no stop in Italy, there'd be no stop in Sardinia. No Italy, no southern France. Thus, unless there was a back migration of M26 eastward, the M26 there is likely to be ancestral to the M26 that is more westerly.
An eastward migration is highly unlikely, be cause the Italian regions where it is found (South and Central Appenines) are extremely isolated, and far from the typical coastal routes. So it is unlikely that a few Sardinian slaves, for example, or English pirates or whatever, spread it. Samnium and Cosenza are way up in the mountains.
Also, there is a U5 mtDNA clade in Sardinia connected to M26 that bears evidence of an Italian refugium that contributed (in a small way) to the post-glacial expansion of mankind into Europe.
In other words, synthesizing the various sources, one gets: I2 likely evolved in Anatolia a very long time ago. It spread westward for sure. A major stopping point was the Balkans, where regular old P37.2 evolved. Another stop was Italy, likely, perhaps Piedmont, which is on the French border. M26 likely evolved there, perhaps during a period of glacial expansion.
Alternatively, the timing of this westward spread is later, and mirrors the Cardium culture. Either way, South Central Italy (Samnium) is directly west of the Balkans. And it is isolated. A strong candidate for a similar Founder effect, like what happened in Sardinia.
From Italy, it spread to Sardinia, and points further west. M26 then had a second expansion during the Bronze or Copper Age, which was seaborne. Others have speculated this mirrors the Megalith culture, and I see no reason why this is not a possibility. The second spread was clearly seaborne.
I think the M26 found way up in the remote mountains of Italy is a great candidate to be ancestral to the others. We need some more research on the SNPs to solve this once and for all. As recent R1b research has shown, the STRs are not enough.
The corrected table can be found by clicking this link.
This pushes Samnites into third place in the M26 frequency chart. It also confirms what I've posted previously about M26 being found in large numbers among Northern Calabrian mountaineers, who have long been noted to be offshoots of the Samnites. (The Ancient sources said that the Brutti broke off from the Lucanians, and the Lucanians broke off from the Samnites. Each of these hardy tribes battle Rome for supremacy in pre-Empire Italy, and they almost won.)
But I digress. Here are the updated charts of frequency for M-26:
Sardinia ~37%
Castile ~19%
Samnium ~10%
Sicily ~7%
Basque Country ~5%
England, Ireland, and ALL W. European Islands whether Mediterranean, Atlantic, or Channel ~3%
General Italy/France ~2%
This might clear things up a bit for the spread of M26.
M26's ancestral clade, P37.2, is concentrated very strongly in the Balkans, and that all data seems to indicate that M26 followed a route that went westward through Italy. In other words, if there had been no stop in Italy, there'd be no stop in Sardinia. No Italy, no southern France. Thus, unless there was a back migration of M26 eastward, the M26 there is likely to be ancestral to the M26 that is more westerly.
An eastward migration is highly unlikely, be cause the Italian regions where it is found (South and Central Appenines) are extremely isolated, and far from the typical coastal routes. So it is unlikely that a few Sardinian slaves, for example, or English pirates or whatever, spread it. Samnium and Cosenza are way up in the mountains.
Also, there is a U5 mtDNA clade in Sardinia connected to M26 that bears evidence of an Italian refugium that contributed (in a small way) to the post-glacial expansion of mankind into Europe.
In other words, synthesizing the various sources, one gets: I2 likely evolved in Anatolia a very long time ago. It spread westward for sure. A major stopping point was the Balkans, where regular old P37.2 evolved. Another stop was Italy, likely, perhaps Piedmont, which is on the French border. M26 likely evolved there, perhaps during a period of glacial expansion.
Alternatively, the timing of this westward spread is later, and mirrors the Cardium culture. Either way, South Central Italy (Samnium) is directly west of the Balkans. And it is isolated. A strong candidate for a similar Founder effect, like what happened in Sardinia.
From Italy, it spread to Sardinia, and points further west. M26 then had a second expansion during the Bronze or Copper Age, which was seaborne. Others have speculated this mirrors the Megalith culture, and I see no reason why this is not a possibility. The second spread was clearly seaborne.
I think the M26 found way up in the remote mountains of Italy is a great candidate to be ancestral to the others. We need some more research on the SNPs to solve this once and for all. As recent R1b research has shown, the STRs are not enough.
Sunday, February 2, 2014
Scholars Finally Apply Some Logic (Not Mythology) To Etruscan Origins
If you read the old Roman and Greek historians, you will notice that they mix their religions and mythology into their writing. For example, a casual perusal of Suetonius will reveal detailed historical facts and stuff about how talking cows portended the eventual rise of this Emperor or that. Even the most serious historians will pass along foundation myths, for example, how Hercules visited this German tribe or that, or how some random tribe of Spaniards or Gauls claimed descent from Troy.
No one takes these other facts seriously, except with respect to the Etruscans.
It's been well-documented that the Etruscans (and the Romans) both embellished ties to the older civilizations of the east, only upon an uptick in contacts with the East.
The Romans invented ties with Troy to beef up their bona fides when faced with older, Hellenistic cultures. The Etruscans did this too.
When the Etruscans were battling the Greeks for cultural supremacy, they constantly faced snobbery because the Greeks were "older" than them. So the Etruscans, who also wanted increased trade with Asia Minor, invented ties with the Lydians there. One or two ancient historians reported this, and enshrined the myth.
If knowledge of Ancient History ain't your thing, just consider how many modern rappers of African-American heritage (to establish their bonafides) call themselves "Gotti" or some variation of the Italian Godfather theme.
The problem is that certain modern armchair historians, due to lack of perspective, or some animus toward how much of Western Civ originated in Italy, or due to some notion that Northern Italians racially superior, welcome and embrace the exotic Etruscans hypothesis. They have done so for a while, despite absolutely ZERO evidence of any invasion or cultural shift in Etruscan areas in pre-Etruscan times. In fact, there is nothing but continuity between Villanovans and their Etruscan successors in the region!
Anyway, now we have genetic studies that finally shut the door on the dummies.
The link can be found here.
The study basically found that there are no more ties with Etruscans to the Near East than there are for other Mediterranean cultures, and that any such links are due to the very first farmers migrating to populate Europe at the dawn of post-Ice Age history.
This has been been confirmed by other evidence too, summarized here.
Can we finally put this "Exotic Etruscans" myth to bed, alongside the other ancient myths, like that Aeneas carried the founders of Rome to Italy from Troy on his back, and that eagles pooping caused Vespasian to become Emperor? Those also appear in ancient histories, after all.
No one takes these other facts seriously, except with respect to the Etruscans.
It's been well-documented that the Etruscans (and the Romans) both embellished ties to the older civilizations of the east, only upon an uptick in contacts with the East.
The Romans invented ties with Troy to beef up their bona fides when faced with older, Hellenistic cultures. The Etruscans did this too.
When the Etruscans were battling the Greeks for cultural supremacy, they constantly faced snobbery because the Greeks were "older" than them. So the Etruscans, who also wanted increased trade with Asia Minor, invented ties with the Lydians there. One or two ancient historians reported this, and enshrined the myth.
If knowledge of Ancient History ain't your thing, just consider how many modern rappers of African-American heritage (to establish their bonafides) call themselves "Gotti" or some variation of the Italian Godfather theme.
The problem is that certain modern armchair historians, due to lack of perspective, or some animus toward how much of Western Civ originated in Italy, or due to some notion that Northern Italians racially superior, welcome and embrace the exotic Etruscans hypothesis. They have done so for a while, despite absolutely ZERO evidence of any invasion or cultural shift in Etruscan areas in pre-Etruscan times. In fact, there is nothing but continuity between Villanovans and their Etruscan successors in the region!
Anyway, now we have genetic studies that finally shut the door on the dummies.
The link can be found here.
The study basically found that there are no more ties with Etruscans to the Near East than there are for other Mediterranean cultures, and that any such links are due to the very first farmers migrating to populate Europe at the dawn of post-Ice Age history.
This has been been confirmed by other evidence too, summarized here.
Can we finally put this "Exotic Etruscans" myth to bed, alongside the other ancient myths, like that Aeneas carried the founders of Rome to Italy from Troy on his back, and that eagles pooping caused Vespasian to become Emperor? Those also appear in ancient histories, after all.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
EXCITING NEWS: New Study Finds Significant M26 Among South Central Italy Mountain Dwellers
Confirms theory that M26 likely represents aboriginal Italians.
In 2009, Maria Pala et al first put out the theory that YCC Hg I-M26 represented the aboriginal Italians, who had stayed in a small Italian refugium during the LGM. The paper was called "Mitochondrial Haplogroup U5b3: A Distant Echo of the Epipaleolithic in Italy and the Legacy of the Early Sardinians" and can be found here. It was kind of an added bonus theory in the paper, which focused on mtDNA but put forth the idea en passant.
Now, a landmark study on Italian Y chromosomes shows significant I-M26 in the archaic Samnium region of Italy. This is and was always a rugged, remote, mountainous part of Italy known even in Roman times as being populated by some of the earliest inhabitants of Italy. This, coupled with what American genetic genealogists already knew (which is the presence of M26 in many males from remote parts of mountainous northern Calabria), would seem to confirm the theory that M26 was present in an Italian refugium during the epipaleolithic. And that those people went on to populate Sardinia and other coastal regions of southwest Europe.
In 2009, Maria Pala et al first put out the theory that YCC Hg I-M26 represented the aboriginal Italians, who had stayed in a small Italian refugium during the LGM. The paper was called "Mitochondrial Haplogroup U5b3: A Distant Echo of the Epipaleolithic in Italy and the Legacy of the Early Sardinians" and can be found here. It was kind of an added bonus theory in the paper, which focused on mtDNA but put forth the idea en passant.
Now, a landmark study on Italian Y chromosomes shows significant I-M26 in the archaic Samnium region of Italy. This is and was always a rugged, remote, mountainous part of Italy known even in Roman times as being populated by some of the earliest inhabitants of Italy. This, coupled with what American genetic genealogists already knew (which is the presence of M26 in many males from remote parts of mountainous northern Calabria), would seem to confirm the theory that M26 was present in an Italian refugium during the epipaleolithic. And that those people went on to populate Sardinia and other coastal regions of southwest Europe.
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Is Y-Chromosome Haplogroup M26 Norman? The Answer Can Be Found By Resorting to Logic
M26 is a clade of Haplogroup I on the Y Chromosome. (It is sometimes called I2a1, but I disfavor
such nomenclature, because I have lived through M26 being renamed often. It is subject to subjective and regular
change, which makes research hard. M26
used to be known as Eu-8 and I1b2.)
M26 is found in large numbers in Sardinia. Between 37-40% of the males there bear
it. It is also found regularly in the
Iberian peninsula: Basque Country, Castile, Aragon, Portugal, etc. Lastly, all of the islands in Western Europe
show M26 as well: Ireland, England, the Balearic Islands, Pantellaria, etc. Some have stated that M26 must have spread,
after its initial emergence, via the ocean, since it is found almost
exclusively along the coasts of western Europe.
There are tens of theories on what the spread of M26
correlates to, both prehistoric and historical.
Some posit it tracks the spread of Cardium Pottery or Atlantic Bronze
Age culture or Megalith builders. Many
now believe that M26 tracks Sardinian obsidian traders, because (a) it has been
shown that Sardinian obsidian traders sailed the oceans plying their wares; (b)
during that period was the only period where Sardinia was an exporter of
humans; (c) and of course the large concentration of M26 in Sardinia. All of these theories relate to prehistoric
happenings, of course.
Some believe M26 tracks historical migrations. Possible candidates include the Roman slave
trade, the Spanish empire, or the Normans.
This exercise
attempts to go through each theory as it relates to the discovery of several
I-M26 in the Calabria region of South Italy. M26’s
presence in Calabria could likely be the key to resolving the issue once and
for all, yet this seems to have escaped modern scholarship.
Below is the list of just a few of the publicly available Calabrian clans that bear M26, tested by a major lab:
Caracciolo – exact origin unknown
Faga – Cortale, Catanzaro
Funicella – San Vincenzo La Costa, Cosenza
Gatto – Lago, Cosenza
Lamantia – Sicilian, but originally from Amantea, Cosenza
Rondinella – Gioiosa Ionica, Reggio Calabria
The presence of M26 in Calabria is rather unique, since it
is the easternmost that it is found in real quantity. It also is not an obvious place for it.
Below, each theory for M26 in Calabria is stated, and how this fits
in the puzzle, is examined. Then, I offer an opinion on each theory.
(1) There is no
significance to Calabrian M26: Lots of
Calabrians have tested M26 because DNA testing is largely an American and UK
phenomenon, and Calabrians simply represent a large portion of
Italian-Americans. As a threshold,
this theory cannot be ignored. As anyone
who participates in genetic genealogy knows, there are far more samples of R1b
because home DNA testing has lots of western European participants. Under this theory, M26 would have a steady
distribution across most of Italy, but would show up in so many American genetic
genealogy sites simply because a large percentage of those getting tested were
Italian-Americans from Calabria. Evaluation: unlikely. There is a large corpus of works testing
Italians in Italy, and M26 has shown up in several regions besides
Calabria. But if M26 were indeed evenly
spread across Italy, we would expect to see large numbers of test kits coming
back M26 from other large groups of Italian-American source populations, i.e.,
Neapolitans. This has not been the
case. There do appear to be higher
percentages of M26 in Calabria.
(2) Calabrian M26
signifies the first humans in Italy: Italy
was a small refugium during the LGM and the males who existed there were
M26. M26 spread along the coast of Italy
and found its way to Sardinia, where it had a founder effect. Calabria, as the toe of Italy and with its
inpenetrable mountains, is where the remnants of a relict M26 population were
driven by subsequent invaders. M26 thus
represents aboriginal Italians from way back.
This theory was set out in “Mitochondrial haplogroup U5b3: a distant
echo of the epipaleolithic in Italy and the legacy of the early Sardinians.” (Available for free in its entirety on
Google). It is buttressed by the
earliest Homo Sapiens and significant Gravettian finds being in the Calabria
area. (Grotto della Romito, etc.) It also would make sense that aboriginal
Italians would be slowly driven into the wild mountains at the very bottom of
the peninsula, by subsequent invasions over time. Evaluation:
very possible. There is an easy way
to test this. Either the Calabrian M26
represents the foundational (upstream) branch, or it doesn’t. Either it shows itself to be ancestral to
Sardinian M26 (and all others), or it does not.
Also, Calabrian M26 samples should be very divergent from those in the
rest of Western Europe.
(3) M26 was spread
WEST by the cardial ware culture. Makers
of Cardium pottery have been shown to have taken a western route along the Mediterranean, and cardial ware has been
posited to correlate with M26. The M26
is Calabria represents those who stayed behind in Italy on the way to Sardinia. This Evaluation:
possible. Again, there is an easy way to test
this. Either the Calabrian M26
represents the foundational (upstream) branch, or it doesn’t. Either it shows itself to be as old as
Sardinian M26, or it does not.
(4) M26 was spread
EAST: M26 was spread easterly into Italy, from more western
Atlantic Bronze Age cultures, or from Sardinian obsidian traders, or from
Western European Megalith builders. Again,
if you Google search or Wikipedia these concepts, you can readily see the
various theories. Sardinian obsidian,
the black gold (or more accurately, the advanced military hardware) of ages
past, was spread by Sardinian obsidian traders all over western Europe, for one
example. Evaluation: possible. As above, there is an easy way to test
this. The Calabrian M26 should show its
closest MRCA to be that of Sardinian M26, and this should be between 3000 and
4000 years ago.
Possible Historical
Sources:
(5) Roman era
causes: M26 in Calabria represents
Sardinian slaves brought into Calabria during Roman times. Rome fought a series of wars in Sardinia
around 200 B.C. They brought back vast
quantities of slaves. For a while,
Romans had a saying, “as cheap as a Sardinian slave.” Rome also conquered Calabria around this
time, and turned vast tracts into public lands.
The public lands were cultivated by slaves, and their descendants bear
M26. If ~40% of Sardinian slaves bore
M26, it follows that a few propagated, and entered the general population. Evaluation:
possible but not likely. There were
many other agricultural regions in Italy besides Calabria. If Sardinian slaves were so prevalent around
Italy in 200 BC, there should be an even spread of M26 in Italy. There simply is not. Yes, there are other mechanisms (Iberian
mercenaries in Hannibal’s army, Spartacus revolts) that could explain a Roman
era M26 propagation. But again, these
are easily testable. If Calabrian M26
represents Sardinian slaves from 200 BC (or Iberian mercenaries from the same
time), those who tested positive should cluster very closely with the source
populations. I don’t believe they do.
(6) Normans: M26 in Calabria represents the blood of
Viking overlords. The Normans did by
coincidence conquer a number of lands where there is M26: the UK, Calabria,
etc. M26 in Calabria could represent the
descendants of these individuals. Evaluation: unlikely. The Normans also didn’t conquer many
lands where there is M26. They had no
presence in Basque country, many of the Spanish states, the interior of
Ireland, Pantellaria in Italy, etc. Plus
the Calabrian M26 would need to cluster with Northern French M26, which it does
not. Furthermore, the Norman invasion of
Italy was only about 1000 years ago, not only during historical times, but at the
cusp of surnames. I believe most of
those testing positive for M26 from Calabria do not bear Norman surnames. (Examples of Norman surnames are Ruggiero,
Gandolfini, etc.) Those testing positive
for M26 from Calabria have Latin surnames.
(7) Spaniards: The Spanish ruled Calabria so the M26 there
likely just comes from Spanish settlers.
There is much M26 is certain provinces of Spain and therefore, if
20% of colonists, mercenaries, or adventurers bore the gene, it would make
sense that a percentage of Calabrians still bear the gene today. Evaluation:
unlikely. Again, easily testable: The Spanish presence in Calabria was so
recent that Calabrians testing positive for M26 should be virtually identical
to Spanish sources. It’s not. Moreover, some of the Calabrian families
testing positive for M26 have their trees traced back to the 1500s, with only
Italian names.
Taking the big picture here, you can decide. I personally think Theory (2) or (3) is most
likely, that M26 in Calabria represents a very ancient people. Even in Roman times, Calabria was called the
First Italy. The tribes that existed
there that blended with the Romans were called the Itali (from which the entire
peninsula was named). The mountains in
Calabria, with dense pine forests, high peaks covered with snow, and
non-navigable passes are an ideal place for the original Italian population to
be found.
Comparing the STR data from these Calabrian families, it shows that they are
most closely related to other Calabrians, and estimates of TMRCA among the
Calabrians is as recent as 500 years ago.
The next closest from what I could see from a very quick look were
samples from the UK, England and Ireland, with a TMCRA back in prehistory. This would seem to eliminate theories 5-7
above.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)